Among the responsibilities of serving as president
of the Texas Association of Counties
is the opportunity to sit up on the stage as
the “presider” over general assembly sessions at TAC
conferences. That’s what I was doing one Friday
morning in August at the closing session of our Annual
Conference, when I nearly fell off my chair.
Larry Naake, executive director of the National
Association of Counties, was presenting an overview
of significant issues pending before the U.S.
Congress when he started talking about a new law
he called “Waters of the United States.” The name of
the bill sounded okay to me but then he explained
that HR 2421, formally known as the Clean Water
Restoration Act of 2007, would eliminate a key
word – “navigable” – from the federal definition of
“waters of the U.S.” If passed, that would mean that
counties across the country would have to seek a
permit from the U.S. Corps of Engineers any time
they needed to clean or do work on local roadside
ditches or gutters! Instead of limiting the permit requirement
to bodies of water big enough for boats,
the kinds of “waters” that the Corps oversees would
be radically expanded.
If that’s a matter that concerns your county, it
would be a good idea to contact your federal Congressman
as well as your two U.S. Senators and tell
them there’s a need to fix HR 2421 by Rep. James
Oberstar.
Let me talk a bit about the other bills that Naake
discussed on behalf of NACo.
One issue of tremendous concern to all of us who
decide to seek re-election is another proposed overhaul
of election equipment and processes. “HAVA-
2” may sound like the name of a sequel horror movie,
and in fact, this bill is both a sequel and a horror.
The first HAVA was the Help America Vote Act. It
passed in response to the long presidential election
stand-off in 2002 and it required federal and local
investment of more than $2 billion dollars to purchase
new election equipment for counties across
the country. This time around, H.R. 811 proposes
to require that every voting system in the country
be capable of providing a paper ballot by next year’s
presidential election and then, by 2012, every county
would again have to upgrade their equipment to
another “yet-to-be-determined” technology. And
people wonder why their taxes keep increasing.
The good news, Naake said, is that the HAVA-2
bill was expected to be passed in the U.S. House by
Easter and here we are past Labor Day and it’s still
hasn’t passed in that body.
Why?
It’s because at NACo’s urging, county officials
across the country have been vociferous in opposition
to the bill. But let’s not stop now – make sure
your federal lawmakers know about the impact of
these ill-advised provisions.
These are only a couple of the legislative matters
that Naake discussed, but they underscore a key service
that NACo performs – keeping counties and
federal officials informed about the impact of federal
legislation and regulations. That service benefits
all counties but unfortunately, not all counties are
doing their part to support NACo.
In Texas, for example, we have 143 counties who
are NACo members. That means almost half of our
counties are just going along for the ride – they get a
key benefit of NACo without paying their fare share
in dues.
The situation has been getting better, with the
help of a NACo membership task force under
the leadership of Denton County Clerk Cynthia
Mitchell. At the urging of Cynthia and her group,
13 additional counties have joined in the past year,
but we can do better. If your county is a NACo
member but you are aware of nearby counties that
are not, please make a point of urging the nonmembers
to join.
And don’t forget to contact your federal representatives
about the ditch permitting bill and HAVA-2.
In numbers, there is strength.
|